Breast Imaging: The Requisites by Debra Ikeda, 2nd edition
Elsevier Science, St. Louis, 2004, $99
This text provides a nice overview of breast imaging, and is a more than adequate resource for a resident in need of an introductory text. The 335-page book can easily be read during a month-long mammography rotation.
Breast Imaging: The Requisites is organized according to modality and mammographic findings (analysis of breast calcifications, analysis of breast masses), rather than by pathology as many mammography texts are organized.
The book's strengths are high quality images, a manageable volume of information, and up-to-date discussions of clinical issues. Particularly noteworthy is the inclusion of data from the 2003 Women’s Health Initiative, a study of breast cancer epidemiology and risk factors, as well as evaluation of the post-operative breast.
The technical aspects of breast imaging are current and expertly covered, including full- field digital mammography, computer-aided detection, breast ultrasound, and image-guided procedures. The chapter on breast MRI provides an excellent discussion of protocols, normal and pathologic findings, approaches to breast lesions and the ACR Breast MRI lexicon. There is also a discussion on the limitations of MRI.
The weaknesses of this book lie in some of the details. For example, there are discrepancies between information contained within the text and information provided in tables and illustrative cases. Some of the images contain very subtle findings that should be annotated for clarity.
Breast Imaging: The Requisites is highly recommended reference for radiology residents and practitioners who desire a digest of the art of breast imaging.
By Dr. Meghan McKeonAuntMinnie.com contributing writer
October 1, 2004
Dr. McKeon is a fourth year resident in diagnostic radiology at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.
The opinions expressed in this review are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of AuntMinnie.com.
Copyright © 2004 AuntMinnie.com
![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=100&q=70&w=100)
![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&dpr=2&fit=crop&h=167&q=70&w=250)
