Study: How well does MRI-guided breast biopsy work?

Breast MRI has been gaining clinical interest of late, with its high sensitivity rate of 86% to 100% for detecting breast cancer. But there can be overlap in the MRI findings of enhancing breast lesions, which makes patient treatment decisions difficult without biopsy. And because other imaging techniques don't always find the breast lesions MRI does, it makes sense to perform the biopsy guided by MRI.

Researchers at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia investigated the outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy as a function of the indication for MRI and the MRI features of the lesions. Dr. Boo-Kyung Han and colleagues published their findings in the American Journal of Roentgenology (December 2008, Vol. 191:6, pp. 1798-1804).

The researchers included 154 women with 172 MRI-detected breast lesions who had received MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2005. Original MRI scans for all but 50 of the women who received the exams at another institution were performed with a 1.5-tesla system (Signa, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, U.K., or Symphony, Siemens Healthcare, Malvern, PA).

The biopsies were performed using a dedicated breast compression coil fitted with a sterile perforated plate and two reference markers containing copper sulfate and a 9- or 10-gauge vacuum-assisted needle and biopsy system (ATEC, Suros Surgical Systems, a subsidiary of Hologic, Bedford, MA, or Vacora, C. R. Bard, Murray Hill, NJ).

Biopsy was deferred in 20 women with 22 lesions but was used in 134 women with 150 lesions. Of these 150 lesions, 39 (26%) were malignant, 90 (60%) were benign, and 21 (14%) were high-risk lesions, four of which were upgraded to malignancies after surgery or other follow-up.

For the 43 malignant lesions, Han's team found that 17 (40%) were in situ carcinoma and 26 (60%) were invasive cancer, bringing the overall probability of malignancy for an MRI abnormality to 29%.

The group also discovered that the positive biopsy rate of MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy varied in different clinical settings. The cancer rate in the diagnostic setting was 36%, higher than the 14% in the screening setting.

"Although the morphologic pattern of a focus, a smooth mass, or a nonmass and the kinetic pattern of persistent enhancement showed a lower cancer rate than a nonsmooth mass and plateau or washout enhancement kinetics, the cancer rate wasn't significantly different according to the MRI features of the lesions," the team wrote.

By Kate Madden Yee
AuntMinnie.com staff writer
December 5, 2008

Related Reading

MR-guided breast biopsy results need careful correlation with histology for on-time diagnosis, September 24, 2007

Presence of invasive cancer may cause MR-guided biopsy to miss DCIS, August 16, 2007

MRI may aid diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ, August 10, 2007

MRI beats US for breast screening of at-risk women, but yields more biopsies, August 6, 2007

Spring-loaded biopsy poses potential hazard of artificial tumor spread, December 27, 2006

Copyright © 2008 AuntMinnie.com

MRI findings of 150 targeted lesions and the probability of malignancy
Features No. of lesions/Total no. of lesions (%) No. of malignant lesions/No. of lesions (%)
Lesion type
Focusa 21/150 (14) 4/21 (19)
Massb 61/150 (41) 21/61 (34)
Nonmassc 68/150 (45) 18/68 (27)
Total 150/150 (100) 43/150 (29)
Morphology
Margin of mass
Smooth 23/150 (15) 5/23 (22)
Nonsmooth 35/150 (23) 15/35 (43)
Distribution of nonmass
Regional 18/150 (12) 5/18 (28)
Segmental 10/150 (7) 3/10 (30)
Linear ductal 19/150 (13) 5/19 (26)
Focal areas 21/150 (14) 5/21 (24)
Undescribed 3/150 (2) 1/3 (33)
Total 129/150 (86) 39/129 (30)
Kinetic feature
Persistent 66/150 (44) 15/66 (23)
Plateau 36/150 (24) 11/36 (31)
Washout 17/150 (11) 5/17 (29)
Undescribed 31/150 (21) 12/31 (39)
Total 150/150 (100) 43/150 (29)
a Size, 4-5 mm; mean, 4.9 mm.
b Size, 6-32 mm; mean, 12.7 mm.
c Size, 6-70 mm; mean, 22.4 mm.
Courtesy of the American Roentgen Ray Society.
Page 1 of 57
Next Page