Dear Women's Imaging Insider,
Ultrasound is a safe and effective modality for obstetric and gynecological applications, helping clinicians track a woman's pregnancy and evaluate disease. But concerns are growing about the potential for contaminated probes to infect patients with pathogenic microorganisms, a group of Israeli researchers say.
Current guidelines for the disinfection of endovaginal ultrasound probes aren't realistic for busy practitioners. Read more about the problem in our Insider Exclusive.
When you've finished reading our featured article, take a look at what else is going on in the Women's Imaging Community:
- Discover why University of Vermont researchers say that digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mitigates the screening mammography "harm" of overdiagnosis.
- How has the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 affected breast cancer screening? Results are mixed, according to a team of investigators from Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.
- Read about the efforts of two digital mammography vendors to bury the hatchet on a mammography patent dispute.
- In our coverage from the Arab Health 2019 meeting, learn why contributing writer Dr. Nehad Kazim Albastaki says DBT is gaining clinical acceptance in the Middle East.
- Can computer-aided diagnosis with ultrasound improve the diagnostic performance of both less-experienced and experienced breast imagers? South Korean investigators say yes.
- Find out why breast MRI is an effective adjunct screening modality for women at high risk for breast cancer who had negative results on full-field digital mammography or DBT exams.
Finally, if you have a comment, report, or article idea to share about any aspect of women's imaging, I invite you to contact me.












![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)






