Asian women are less likely to receive appropriate follow-up tests after an abnormal mammogram compared with white women, according to a study published online on June 12 in Cancer.
Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco found that Asian women had a 15% rate of not receiving follow-up one year after an abnormal mammogram, compared with white women, who had a rate of 10%.
A team led by Kim Hanh Nguyen, ScD, included data from 50,970 women in the San Francisco area with mammogram results between 2000 and 2010 that showed a need for further diagnostic imaging. The group found that among Asian women, Vietnamese, Filipina, and Japanese women had the longest median time to follow-up imaging tests at 32, 28, and 19 days, respectively, compared with non-Hispanic white women at 15 days.
In addition, the proportion of women receiving follow-up tests at 30 days was lower for Asians than for non-Hispanic whites (57% versus 77%). These disparities continued at 60 and 90 days for all Asian ethnic groups except Japanese women, the researchers found.
The findings suggest a need to investigate and address barriers to effective cancer prevention in Asian women, according to the study authors.
"Rather than being a monolithic group, Asians are, in fact, very diverse in nationalities, language, immigration history, education, and economic background," Nguyen said in a statement released by the journal. "Recognizing differences among Asians may help clinicians develop better rapport and communication with their Asian patients, which can improve adherence to screening recommendations."











![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)






