Dear AuntMinnie Member,
This week we're featuring coverage from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) meeting under way in Vancouver, Canada.
In one AAPM study, Texas researchers found that switching from analog to digital mammography increases the repeat rate for mammograms; the extra exams to some extent offset the reduction in radiation dose provided by digital mammography, although overall dose was still lower. Learn more by clicking here.
In another study, Canadian investigators looked at quality control software they developed to improve the consistency and reliability of digital mammography. In a pilot test of the software, the group analyzed the application's ability to manage quality control across multiple breast imaging facilities. Get the rest of the story by clicking here.
Comments on CAD study
Mammography saw the publication of several controversial studies last week, one of which stated that the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) didn't improve the accuracy of screening mammography, and also increased recall rates.
This week we're offering commentary on the study by several breast imaging experts, who point out some of the flaws in the study, such as its reliance on CAD technology that's now 5 to 10 years old.
Still, breast imaging specialists could learn a thing or two from the study, despite its flaws. Find out what by clicking here, or visit our Women's Imaging Digital Community.









![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)





