Computer-aided detection (CAD) developer R2 Technology of Sunnyvale, CA, today said it would vigorously defend itself against a patent infringement lawsuit filed by competitor iCAD of Nashua, NH, in a New Hampshire federal court.
R2 called iCAD’s claim "meritless," and said that the litigation was a "diversionary tactic" designed to shift attention away from R2’s own patent infringement case against iCAD. That case is scheduled to go to trial in October in Delaware, R2 president Mike Klein said.
By AuntMinnie.com staff writersJuly 2, 2003
Related Reading
iCAD files suit against R2, July 1, 2003
iCAD Q1 sales jump, May 13, 2003
iCAD delivers FFDM product, March 25, 2003
iCAD Q4 shows profit, March 6, 2003
iCAD gets OK for new MammoReader software, March 5, 2003
Copyright © 2003 AuntMinnie.com











![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)






