Sunday, November 29 | 10:45 a.m.-10:55 a.m. | SSA04-01 | Room S404CD
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a well-known risk factor for lung cancer. But do some COPD phenotypes carry a greater risk of malignancy?"The finding of a lung nodule on a low-dose CT performed for lung cancer screening often prompts further investigation and generates anxiety for the patient," wrote Dr. Caroline Chiles from Wake Forest University Health Sciences Center. "The likelihood that a nodule is malignant can be assessed with a risk prediction model."
In a study of 6- to 9-mm indeterminate lung nodules, readers performed a visual analysis of CT scans for centrilobular emphysema, bronchial wall thickening, centrilobular nodularity, and interstitial fibrosis. They were asked to classify each scan as normal, emphysema-predominant COPD, airway-predominant COPD, or mixed-pattern COPD.
"We found that CT evidence of centrilobular emphysema, paraseptal emphysema, and the CT-defined emphysema-predominant COPD subtype were more closely associated with lung cancer risk than spirometric evidence of airflow limitation," Chiles told AuntMinnie.com.
CT information for both the emphysema-predominant COPD phenotype and severity may perform better in risk prediction than spirometry, the authors concluded.















![Axial images from unenhanced calcium score cardiac CT (left) and curved planar reformation images from CT angiography (right) show that higher long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with greater coronary artery calcium and more obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Top row: Images in a 68-year-old male patient with higher 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (7.9 μg/m3 for particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm in diameter [PM2.5] and 17.4 parts per billion [ppb] for NO2) with extensive CAD (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] >1,000 and obstructive CAD [≥70% diameter stenosis]). Bottom row: Images in a 57-year-old female patient with lower 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (6.3 μg/m3 for PM2.5 and 4.6 ppb for NO2) with no CAD (CACS = 0 and no obstructive stenosis).](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/06/hanneman.r6SMLzkezo.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)




