The American College of Radiology (ACR) is urging its members to contact their Congressional representatives this week in an effort to avert cuts to medical imaging reimbursement similar to those enacted in the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005.
The Reston, VA, society said that legislation has passed the House of Representatives that would enact "billions of dollars in additional imaging cuts" on top of the DRA's reductions. The cuts are on a list of reductions in a Medicare package that the Senate is debating this week.
The ACR is urging its members to call members of the Senate Finance Committee who are negotiating the reductions, called "pay fors," in the Medicare bill. The society is also asking ACR members to ask their House representatives to sign on to a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) protesting additional cuts.
The ACR said it would sponsor an onsite phone campaign at this month's RSNA meeting in Chicago, and would also conduct grassroots campaigns through state chapters to key lawmakers in the House and Senate.
Related Reading
ACR launches radiology PR campaign, November 7, 2007
Maryland court backs state's self-referral law, October 26, 2007
ACR's withdrawal from NAPBC draws mixed response, August 30, 2007
Google snubs radiology, ACR claims, July 19, 2007
ACR, SBI pass on NAPBC, July 17, 2007
Copyright © 2007 AuntMinnie.com


















![Axial images from unenhanced calcium score cardiac CT (left) and curved planar reformation images from CT angiography (right) show that higher long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with greater coronary artery calcium and more obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Top row: Images in a 68-year-old male patient with higher 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (7.9 μg/m3 for particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm in diameter [PM2.5] and 17.4 parts per billion [ppb] for NO2) with extensive CAD (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] >1,000 and obstructive CAD [≥70% diameter stenosis]). Bottom row: Images in a 57-year-old female patient with lower 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (6.3 μg/m3 for PM2.5 and 4.6 ppb for NO2) with no CAD (CACS = 0 and no obstructive stenosis).](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/06/hanneman.r6SMLzkezo.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)