Audio seminar presented by Bernie Van Someren and Jill Knight, regarded as two of the country's preeminent experts on CRM coding. Highlights: a brief review of definitions, rules, and regulations pertaining to EP coding; how to code correctly and achieve the appropriate charge capture for comprehensive versus single-site studies, isoproterenol (Isuprel) administration, and radiofrequency versus transeptal ablation; proper use of modifier -51 when an EP study is performed with ablation; knowing the basics of EP-specific inpatient procedure coding and DRGs; valuable billing tips addressing left atrial and left ventricular evaluations, comprehensive EPS following ablation, and transeptal abalation; pointers for avoiding common mistakes, such as unbundling; answers to your questions, time permitting -- your opportunity to resolve the coding and billing issues you face every day.
Coding for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Electrophysiology
Jul 29th, 2009
Latest in Home










![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)




