Tuesday, December 3 | 10:30 a.m.-10:40 a.m. | VSBR31-10 | Arie Crown Theater
Adding tomosynthesis to mammography for breast cancer screening increases interpretation time when compared with conventional digital mammography alone, according to researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital.Dr. Phoebe Freer and colleagues gathered 10 radiologists to read digital mammography alone or combined tomosynthesis/mammography screening examinations in batch mode for one-hour uninterrupted sessions. The group took into consideration the experience level of each radiologist and differences in the number of studies read per hour.
They found that adding tomosynthesis to mammography increased reading time. Estimating this difference reliably is key to preparing for tomosynthesis' effects on radiologist workload, they concluded.












![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)






