Cancer screening for three common cancers covered by U.S. screening programs still lags behind target levels, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported this week.
Screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers all fell below the recommended levels targeted in Healthy People 2020, a program that sets national objectives for use of recommended cancer screening tests. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening tests for each of these cancers to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Compliance with screening guidelines depended heavily on ethnic background and years of residence in the U.S., wrote Carrie Klabunde, PhD, and colleagues from the U.S. National Cancer Institute in cooperation with other U.S. institutions.
The results were based on data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a nationwide household survey that samples the noninstitutionalized population of the U.S. for screening compliance based on age, race, ethnicity, education, length of U.S. residence, and source of healthcare financing.
The overall breast cancer screening rate was 72.4%, compared with the Healthy People 2020 target of 81.1%. The overall cervical cancer screening rate was 83%, compared with a target of 93%, and the overall colorectal cancer screening rate was 58.6%, compared with a target of 70.5%, the researchers reported.
Screening rates for all three types of cancer were significantly lower among Asians than among whites and blacks. In addition, Hispanics were less likely than others to be screened for cervical and colorectal cancer. Higher screening rates were positively associated with education, availability and use of healthcare, and length of U.S. residence.









![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)






