Dear AuntMinnie Member,
Detecting flat polyps in the colon is one of the toughest jobs for virtual colonoscopy -- and conventional colonoscopy, for that matter. A new clinical study by Italian researchers suggests that small flat polyps are a problem capable of frustrating even virtual colonoscopy's most able practitioners.
The good news is that the study in question set the bar pretty high for virtual colonoscopy, according to an article by staff writer Eric Barnes that we're featuring in our Virtual Colonoscopy Digital Community.
First off, the researchers declined to use cathartic preparation for the bowel, in order to provide a comfortable screening environment attractive to the largest number of patients. Then they compared virtual colonoscopy not to standard colonoscopy, but to an advanced version that typically does a better job of finding flat polyps.
Virtual colonoscopy detected only about a third of the flat polyps found with the advanced colonoscopy technique. But the news isn't all bad. Most of the missed lesions were very small; VC found most of the larger ones. And technologies like IV contrast and computer-aided detection -- which weren't used in the study -- might improve the technique's performance in the future.
Read more about this preliminary study and its implications by clicking here, or visit our Virtual Colonoscopy Digital Community, at vc.auntminnie.com.
![Axial images from unenhanced calcium score cardiac CT (left) and curved planar reformation images from CT angiography (right) show that higher long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with greater coronary artery calcium and more obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Top row: Images in a 68-year-old male patient with higher 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (7.9 μg/m3 for particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm in diameter [PM2.5] and 17.4 parts per billion [ppb] for NO2) with extensive CAD (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] >1,000 and obstructive CAD [≥70% diameter stenosis]). Bottom row: Images in a 57-year-old female patient with lower 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (6.3 μg/m3 for PM2.5 and 4.6 ppb for NO2) with no CAD (CACS = 0 and no obstructive stenosis).](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/06/hanneman.r6SMLzkezo.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&dpr=2&fit=crop&h=167&q=70&w=250)
