The U.S. Food and Drug administration has issued a notification emphasizing the importance of keeping radiation dose during CT procedures as low as reasonably achievable, "especially for pediatric and small adult patients, who may sometimes receive more radiation than needed to obtain diagnostic images," the agency said.
The notification stresses the importance of adjusting CT scanner parameters appropriately based on a patient's weight and size, as well as the anatomic area being scanned. Because exposure latitude is so wide with CT, overexposure which might render radiographic images unusable can still be read on CT images, enabling doctors to ignore the problem.
The document recommends that CT settings be optimized by:
- Reducing tube current. "With all other factors held constant, patient radiation dose is directly proportional to x-ray tube current," the notice stated.
- Using charts or tables of tube-current settings based on patient weight and size, and anatomic regions of interest.
- Increase table increment (axial scanning) or pitch (helical scanning).
The document also recommends that doctors reduce the number of multiple scans with contrast material by eliminating precontrast scans when medically appropriate. Finally, the agency recommends the elimination of inappropriate referrals for CT.
"In some cases, conventional radiography, sonography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be just as effective as CT, and with lower radiation exposure," the FDA wrote.
The November 2 Public Health Notification is available on the Internet, at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/110201-ct.html .
By Eric Barnes
AuntMinnie.com staff writer
November 6, 2001
Related Reading
CT dose study is good news for interventional radiologists, October 5, 2001
Low-dose CT fluoroscopy minimizes interventional exposure, July 30, 2001
FDA's radiation concerns may lead to dose displays for scanners, May 22, 2001
Copyright © 2001AuntMinnie.com














![Axial images from unenhanced calcium score cardiac CT (left) and curved planar reformation images from CT angiography (right) show that higher long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with greater coronary artery calcium and more obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Top row: Images in a 68-year-old male patient with higher 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (7.9 μg/m3 for particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm in diameter [PM2.5] and 17.4 parts per billion [ppb] for NO2) with extensive CAD (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] >1,000 and obstructive CAD [≥70% diameter stenosis]). Bottom row: Images in a 57-year-old female patient with lower 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (6.3 μg/m3 for PM2.5 and 4.6 ppb for NO2) with no CAD (CACS = 0 and no obstructive stenosis).](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/06/hanneman.r6SMLzkezo.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)





