Leonard Berlin, MD[email protected]BreastThe breast screening hullabaloo: Where are we today?The new U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography screening guidelines have sparked controversy, but what effects, exactly, have they wrought since their release? In this AuntMinnie Second Opinion, Leonard Berlin, MD, provides his view of the screening state of affairs.August 18, 2010Page 1 of 1Top StoriesMolecular ImagingTau PET tracer flags early Alzheimer risk in healthy older adultsFew studies have investigated how F-18 PI-2620 is associated with memory performance or AD-related biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired older adults.AIRadiologists can identify three out of four AI-generated imagesWomens ImagingWomen's Imaging MinnieCast, Episode 13: Partial breast irradiation in the spotlightAIRadiology dominates thirty years of FDA AI device approvalsRadiologic TechnologistPetition seeks to increase number of attempts for taking ARRT exam
![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&dpr=2&fit=crop&h=167&q=70&w=250)
