
Radiologists no longer predominate in the performance of ultrasound-guided procedures, which may have implications for the quality of patient care, according to a study published online in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Ultrasound is being used more and more for guidance during procedures, and the growth has been especially high in private offices, a trend that should be tracked just as much as nonradiologist ownership of CT, MR, and PET devices, wrote Dr. Richard Sharpe Jr. and colleagues from Thomas Jefferson University.
Dr. Richard Sharpe Jr. from Thomas Jefferson University.
"More research is needed to discern whether increases in utilization of ultrasound-guided procedures are the result of increased adoption of US guidance for procedures that would have been previously performed without US guidance or whether the increased utilization reflects a lower threshold among nonradiologists for performing these procedures because they had acquired US capabilities," they wrote. "The latter could raise concern for self-referral, depending on the clinical appropriateness of these procedures."
Sharpe and colleagues used data from the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files between 2004 and 2010. They extracted billing claims submitted for ultrasound-guided procedures, analyzed volume by provider type and setting, and calculated compound annual growth rates (JACR, September 27, 2013).
They found that the total utilization rate for all ultrasound-guided procedures increased by 100.8% over the time period, from 2,425 procedures per 100,000 Medicare patients in 2004 to 4,870 procedures per 100,000 patients in 2010, for a compound annual growth rate of 12.3%.
The year 2010 was the first that nonradiologists as a group performed more ultrasound-guided procedures than radiologists, at 922,672 versus 794,497 examinations, respectively.
In addition, the team discovered the following:
- Nonradiologists accounted for 72.2% of the volume growth in ultrasound-guided procedures from 2004 to 2010.
- Most 2010 claims were submitted by radiologists (46.3%) and surgeons (19.4%).
- The largest overall volume increases from 2004 to 2010 were seen among radiologists, surgeons, anesthesiologists, rheumatologists, primary care physicians, and nonrheumatologist internal medicine subspecialists.
Some of the increase in the use of ultrasound guidance is likely due to it being added to certain procedures, such as joint aspirations, steroid injections, and tissue biopsies, Sharpe's group wrote. And some of the increase may be because of nonradiologist ownership of the devices. There are benefits to patients in this latter scenario in terms of convenience, but it's important to make sure that these procedures are being performed by properly trained providers and for suitable clinical uses.
"The safe utilization of ultrasound in one's practice requires extensive training," Sharpe and colleagues concluded. "The efficient allocation of healthcare resources, patient safety, and healthcare quality all depend on these procedures being performed for the appropriate clinical indications and by individuals with appropriate training."



















![Examples of ultrasound findings and techniques. (A) Images in a 39-year-old male patient with a mass in the left thigh. The mass is heterogeneous on the B-mode US image (compared with the patient in D) and showed increased microvascularity (superb microvascular imaging [SMI]) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) values. Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma was diagnosed at biopsy (with pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma in surgical specimen). (B) Images in an 18-year-old male patient with a mass in the left leg. The mass is hypoechoic on the B-mode image, with no other findings suggestive of malignancy. The lesion is in contact with the cortex of the tibia, which is slightly irregular. CT revealed a doubtful anteromedial tibial erosion. The microvascular study demonstrated high vascularization, suggestive of malignancy. Periosteal Ewing sarcoma was diagnosed with both histologic and immunohistochemical confirmation. (C) Images in a 69-year-old female patient with a lump growing on the outside of the left leg. Multiple SWE examinations were performed (please note the high values obtained in the measurements, whereas the color map highlights the stiffness relative to adjacent tissues). SMI showed areas of increased vascularization to target for sampling. Undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma was diagnosed at biopsy, with residual leiomyosarcoma in the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant therapy. (D) Images in a 56-year-old female patient with a mass in the right thigh. The mass is heterogeneous at both B-mode ultrasound (similar to patient A) and MRI (coronal T2-weighted spectral attenuated inversion recovery [SPAIR]; T1-weighted pre-contrast and postcontrast imaging), which even shows uptake after the administration of paramagnetic contrast material, which is traditionally suggestive of malignancy. Low values at SMI and elastography are suggestive of benignity. Spindle cell lipoma was diagnosed at biopsy, with atypical spindle cell lipomatous tumor in the surgical specimen.](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/08/images-radiol250278fig2.APCFLSvX6p.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)
