Sunday, November 30 | 12:05 p.m.-12:15 p.m. | SSA18-09 | Room S505AB
Fused PET/MR images can provide a more accurate assessment of local disease extension in rectal cancer patients than FDG-PET/CT and pelvic MRI.That conclusion comes from a study led by Dr. Rajesh Gupta, a third-year radiology resident at Stony Brook University Hospital.
Gupta and colleagues conducted a retrospective review of rectal cancer patients at Stony Brook from June 2008 through March 2013. They selected 18 patients (average age, 58 years) who were initially staged with FDG-PET/CT and pelvic MRI within a three-month interval. The results ranged from stage I to III cancer.
The researchers compared PET/CT and MRI to determine the extent of tumors and local and distant metastases. They then fused PET and pelvic MRI to assess nodal involvement using fusion software.
Five patients (28%) were upstaged based on hypermetabolic lesions seen on PET/CT; three moved from stage III to IV. Four patients (22%) were downstaged because lymph nodes identified on MRI were negative on PET. MRI and FDG-PET/CT examinations were concordant for the remaining nine patients (50%).
MRI provides "excellent anatomical evaluation" of tumor size and extent, while PET/CT offers additional information on metabolic activity, Gupta and colleagues concluded.
"Fusion PET/MRI can provide more accurate staging of local nodal involvement," they wrote in the study abstract. "This may change the initial stage, which can affect treatment options."


















![Comparative PET/CT scan images showing [18F]FAPI and [18F]FDG imaging with MIP projections, fusion views, and CT cross-sections for medical diagnosis](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/10/fapi-vs-fdg.nL6Acp6W2i.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)
