More than 25% of children treated for headache across a range of care settings receive a CT scan, potentially exposing them to unnecessary radiation and an increased cancer risk, according to a large retrospective study published in the July edition of Pediatrics.
The study found that children evaluated in the emergency room (ER) were four times more likely to have CT scans than those children who did not go to the ER. However, the researchers also discovered widespread use of CT scans outside of the ER. In pediatric patients getting CT scans for headaches, 67% received their scans outside of the ER setting, according to the study.
The analysis included 15,836 children ages 3 to 17 years with at least two medical claims for headache, wrote lead author Andrea DeVries, PhD, from healthcare insurer WellPoint's HealthCore clinical outcomes research subsidiary, and colleagues (Pediatrics, Vol. 132:1, pp. e1-e8).
In a release, WellPoint noted that the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) recommends MRI scans instead of CT for people with headache and a normal history and neurologic examination. This recommendation was endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Radiology, WellPoint said.
The study found that AAN imaging guidelines were most often followed by neurologists when treating children, but not by other physicians, co-author Dr. Alan Rosenberg said in the statement.


















![Axial images from unenhanced calcium score cardiac CT (left) and curved planar reformation images from CT angiography (right) show that higher long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with greater coronary artery calcium and more obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Top row: Images in a 68-year-old male patient with higher 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (7.9 μg/m3 for particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm in diameter [PM2.5] and 17.4 parts per billion [ppb] for NO2) with extensive CAD (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] >1,000 and obstructive CAD [≥70% diameter stenosis]). Bottom row: Images in a 57-year-old female patient with lower 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (6.3 μg/m3 for PM2.5 and 4.6 ppb for NO2) with no CAD (CACS = 0 and no obstructive stenosis).](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/06/hanneman.r6SMLzkezo.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)

