Despite the best intentions, many people don't follow through with screening exams even though they understand their value. The phenomenon can be more pronounced among those who are poor or in poor health, according to the results of a study by U.K. researchers.
A group from the Health Behaviour Research Centre at University College London studied 2,969 Scottish adults ages 55 to 64 who were invited to receive screenings for colorectal cancer. Of those who said they intended to get a screening exam, only 61% actually made it to the appointment, according to the study, which was published in the latest issue of Annals of Behavioral Medicine.
Lead author Emily Power and colleagues found that among the no-shows, those with the highest rates of nonattendance were of lower socioeconomic status and had poorer overall health and thus a higher percentage of doctor visits. The authors speculated that the latter factor may have interfered with their ability to attend the cancer screening.
The one factor that seemed to affect whether a person of average risk followed through with a colorectal cancer screening was whether they received a recommendation from a healthcare provider, the authors said.
Related Reading
Chemical changes may help detect colon cancer early, June 11, 2008
Family history of colon cancer may improve survival, June 9, 2008
Highest colonoscopy screening rates are in low-risk patients, May 29, 2008
Some advanced cancer patients living longer: study, April 8, 2008
American Cancer Society recognizes virtual colonoscopy screening benefit, March 5, 2008
Copyright © 2008 AuntMinnie.com













![Axial images from unenhanced calcium score cardiac CT (left) and curved planar reformation images from CT angiography (right) show that higher long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with greater coronary artery calcium and more obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Top row: Images in a 68-year-old male patient with higher 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (7.9 μg/m3 for particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm in diameter [PM2.5] and 17.4 parts per billion [ppb] for NO2) with extensive CAD (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] >1,000 and obstructive CAD [≥70% diameter stenosis]). Bottom row: Images in a 57-year-old female patient with lower 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (6.3 μg/m3 for PM2.5 and 4.6 ppb for NO2) with no CAD (CACS = 0 and no obstructive stenosis).](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/06/hanneman.r6SMLzkezo.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)





