Thursday, December 3 | 11:10 a.m.-11:20 a.m. | SSQ19-05 | Room S403B
How well does CT equipped with a tin filter measure lung nodule volumes at radiation dose levels similar to those of a chest x-ray? Pretty well, most of the time, Mayo Clinic researchers will report in this Thursday presentation.Using an x-ray beam with an added tin filter may allow lung cancer screening CT to be performed at a dose level approaching that of a chest x-ray, according to Chi Ma, PhD, and colleagues from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN.
The study sought to evaluate the accuracy of lung nodule volume measurements at very low dose levels.
"The use of a tin filter to shape the x-ray beam may improve the dose efficiency of a CT system by removing low-energy photons that do not contribute to image quality," explained study co-author Dr. Joel Fletcher in an email to AuntMinnie.com. "We examined this approach using a tin filter for patients of different sizes at routine lung cancer screening chest CT, compared to routine acquisition, and the estimated potential reduction both in terms of image noise and radiation dose."
Using the tin filter maintained the accuracy of automated volume measurements of high-contrast nodules within 2% of the accuracy of the standard dose, the team found. However, accuracy degraded for low-contrast nodules at -800 Hounsfield units due to increased noise.















![Axial images from unenhanced calcium score cardiac CT (left) and curved planar reformation images from CT angiography (right) show that higher long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with greater coronary artery calcium and more obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Top row: Images in a 68-year-old male patient with higher 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (7.9 μg/m3 for particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm in diameter [PM2.5] and 17.4 parts per billion [ppb] for NO2) with extensive CAD (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] >1,000 and obstructive CAD [≥70% diameter stenosis]). Bottom row: Images in a 57-year-old female patient with lower 10-year mean ambient air pollution exposure (6.3 μg/m3 for PM2.5 and 4.6 ppb for NO2) with no CAD (CACS = 0 and no obstructive stenosis).](https://img.auntminnie.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/06/hanneman.r6SMLzkezo.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)




