Medicare cuts don't lead to higher procedure volume
Article Thumbnail ImageFebruary 12, 2010 -- A new study published this month found that physicians don't necessarily order more tests to make up for lost revenue in the face of Medicare reimbursement cuts.
Member Sign In:
  MemberID or E-mail Address:
  Password:
(?)

New AuntMinnie.com Members

Becoming a Member is FREE!

  • Real-time radiology-specific news
  • Case of the Day and Teaching Files
  • Focused topics digital communities
  • Lively, discussion groups
  • Medical imaging bookstore
  • SalaryScan
  • Job Boards
  • Online CME
  • Bookstore, market reports, more …
  • Conference Calendar
  • User-controlled eNewsletters
  • … registration is FREE and easy!
  • Jack Hadley, Ph.D., of George Mason University's College of Health and Human Services in Fairfax, VA, and colleagues examined data for eight specific Medicare services (office visits, hospital visits, consultations, and cardiac tests) that physicians delivered to their Medicare patients to investigate so-called volume-offset behavior, the belief that physicians respond to lower Medicare fees by increasing service volume to make up for potential lost revenue (Inquiry, Winter 2009/2010, Vol. 46:4, pp. 372-390).

    They found no evidence that physicians are performing more services to make up for fee decreases. But they did find that the relative profit a physician receives for providing a service is positively related to the quantity provided -- that is, if the cost of providing a service falls more than the reduction in the Medicare fee, the service actually increases in profitability and physicians will have an incentive to increase its volume.

    The results also suggest that the uniform annual changes in Medicare physician fees under current Medicare policy tend to distort physician practice patterns, not necessarily to the benefit of patients, according to Hadley. Policymakers, instead, might consider modifying Medicare fees to encourage services believed to be effective but underused and discourage services believed less effective and overused, he wrote.

    Related Reading

    Analysis: New Medicare cuts may outdo DRA, September 29, 2009

    AMIC: Voters oppose imaging cuts, September 9, 2009

    Flawed MedPAC survey drives debate on imaging payment cuts, August 11, 2009

    MITA, patient groups lobby against imaging cuts, July 30, 2009

    Radiology rallies to fight more reimbursement cuts, July 1, 2009

    Copyright © 2010 AuntMinnie.com


    || About || Advertising || AuntMinnieCME.com || Bookstore || Breast MRI || Career Center || Case of the Day || Communities || Conferences || Contact Us || ECR News 2014 || Education || Equipment Classifieds || Europe || Facebook || Forums || Home || Links || Marketplace || Middle East || Mobile || Molecular Breast Imaging || New Installations || News in Brief || People in the News || Privacy Policy || RSNA News 2013 || Reference || Salary Survey Results || Trends in Radiology || Twitter || Vendor Connect || Webinars || XML/RSS ||

    Copyright © 2014 AuntMinnie.com. All Rights Reserved.