Axillary dissection "has important implications for proper cancer staging and prognosis and has the additional benefit of removing all disease from the lymph nodes," study author Dr. Nabil Wasif wrote in an e-mail to Reuters Health.

The retrospective analysis included 5,353 patients with sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer treated from 1998 to 2005. Patient data came from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor registry.

The prevalence of sentinel node micrometastases increased from 2.5% in 1998 to 17.7% in 2005, according to Dr. Wasif and coauthors. All micrometastases were diagnosed with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Following the positive sentinel node biopsy, 59.6% of patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection, but the remainder had no further nodal surgery.

On average, patients who had axillary node dissection were significantly younger than those who did not (56.6 versus 60.2 years, p < 0.001). Patients who had both procedures were also more likely to have larger tumors (mean, 1.8 versus 1.7 cm, p = 0.002) and higher tumor grade (33% versus 28%, p = 0.001) and were less likely to be estrogen receptor-positive (85% versus 88%, p = 0.003).

At a median follow-up of 36 months, there was no significant difference in five-year overall survival between patients who did or did not have axillary lymph node dissection (89% versus 90%).

"Nobody has shown conclusively that removing all sentinel lymph nodes is more beneficial to patient survival," Dr. Harold Bear, who was not involved in the study, told Reuters Health in a phone interview. In addition, axillary node dissection has a longer recovery and increases the risk for lymphedema and nerve damage. "There's a good reason" why some surgeons don't do axillary node dissections, Dr. Bear said. He is the head of the Breast Health Center at the Massey Cancer Center of Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond.

Among the 3,193 patients who had lymph node dissection, examination of nonsentinel nodes upstaged 18.6% to N1 disease, 2.2% to N2, and 0.1% to N3.

"For now axillary dissection for sentinel node micrometastases should remain standard, in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines," said Dr. Wasif.

By Victoria Stern

Arch Surg 2010.

Last Updated: 2010-02-16 19:10:27 -0400 (Reuters Health)

Related Reading

Contrast ultrasound makes for less invasive sentinel node staging, November 11, 2009

Axillary ultrasound can help avoid sentinel node biopsy surgery, October 8, 2009

Ultrasonography not a reliable replacement for sentinel lymph node biopsy, September 29, 2009

Copyright © 2010 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.