Noncardiac incidental findings common on cardiac CT
Article Thumbnail ImageOctober 6, 2009 -- NEW YORK (Reuters Health), Oct 6 - Noncardiac incidental findings are common in patients undergoing cardiac CT, say researchers from Canada -- and their investigation "is not without cost or risk."
Member Sign In:
  MemberID or E-mail Address:
  Password:
(?)

New AuntMinnie.com Members

Becoming a Member is FREE!

  • Real-time radiology-specific news
  • Case of the Day and Teaching Files
  • Focused topics digital communities
  • Lively, discussion groups
  • Medical imaging bookstore
  • SalaryScan
  • Job Boards
  • OnLine CMe/CE
  • Bookstore, market reports, more …
  • Conference Calendar
  • User-controlled eNewsletters
  • … registration is FREE and easy!
  • Dr. Jimmy MacHaalany from University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada, and colleagues investigated the incidence of clinically significant and indeterminate noncardiac incidental findings among 966 patients referred for cardiac CT.

    According to their report in the October 13 Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 401 patients (41.5%) had new noncardiac incidental findings. Most were pulmonary (54%), with pulmonary nodules accounting for 14% of all incidental findings.

    Only 12 patients (1.2%) had incidental findings that required intervention.

    Sixty-eight patients (7.0%) had indeterminate findings that required further diagnostic work-up, but none of these became clinically significant, the researchers note. During the course of their diagnostic work-ups, however, three patients were serendipitously diagnosed with malignancies unrelated to the incidental finding.

    Incidental findings were not associated with a significant change in mortality, but the total direct cost of investigating all incidental findings (including the cost of treating the sole complication after transthoracic biopsy) exceeded $83,000.

    "Larger studies are needed to better understand potential morbidity and mortality benefit of detecting incidental findings," the investigators say.

    "Since there is no professional consensus about the approach to reading cardiac CT scans for noncardiac findings, we suggest that the patient's concerns and preferences should be taken into consideration, as they would in any 'close call,' " Dr. Mark Hlatky from Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo Alto, CA, and Dr. Carlos Iribarren from Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, write in a related editorial.

    "After being properly informed, the patient could then choose whether to 'opt in' or 'opt out' of having the noncardiac structures examined to search for incidental findings," the editorial concludes.

    J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1533-1541,1542-1543.

    Last Updated: 2009-10-05 17:00:29 -0400 (Reuters Health)

    Related Reading

    EISNER: Calcium CT screening predicts cardiac events, October 1, 2009

    Coronary CTA beats calcium scoring for short-term prognosis, August 14, 2009

    Coronary artery calcium independently predicts risk in CAD patients, July 29, 2009

    Zero calcium means good outcomes, even with undetected plaques, July 23, 2009

    CTA predicts coronary plaque instability, June 30, 2009

    Copyright © 2009 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.


    || About || Advertising || Bookstore || Breast MRI || Career Center || Case of the Day || Communities || Conferences || Contact Us || ECR News 2013 || Education || Equipment Classifieds || Facebook || Forums || Home || Links || Marketplace || Mobile || Molecular Breast Imaging || New Installations || News in Brief || People in the News || Privacy Policy || RSNA News 2012 || Reference || Salary Survey Results || Trends in Radiology || Twitter || Vendor Connect || Webinars || XML/RSS ||

    Copyright © 2013 AuntMinnie.com. All Rights Reserved.