Case report: Conjoined twins -- thoraco-omphalopagus (type A)

2015 12 09 18 15 29 266 Conjoined Twins Us1 20151210013844

A case of conjoined twins discovered by routine transabdominal ultrasound examination at 16-weeks gestation in a 19-year-old multigravid female. They were joined at the chest and the abdomen and had one functional heart. The pregnancy was terminated by cesarean section at 19-weeks gestation with approval from the family.

Clinical presentation

A 19-year-old multigravid female was visiting our private clinic for a routine antenatal transabdominal ultrasound check at 16-weeks gestation. Two fetuses joined at the chest and abdomen were identified by two-dimensional ultrasound, and further confirmation was made by three- and four-dimensional ultrasound. There was blood incompatibility between the parents (the husband was A+, whereas the mother was A-). Anti-D was previously administered after delivery of her first child, a single viable healthy male baby. She had no history of abortion or miscarriage. Her height was 165 cm, weight 63 kg, looked normal, was neither anemic nor hypertensive, and had no history of chronic diseases.

The last menstrual date of this twin pregnancy was unknown. The mother did experience normal fetal movements. She had no vaginal discharge or hyperemesis gravidarum. Her abdomen was slightly large for the date of pregnancy. There was no family history of twins.

Investigations and imaging findings

A Voluson 730 ultrasound machine from GE Healthcare (Waukesha, WI) was used. The transabdominal ultrasound was performed, and two conjoined female fetuses were detected; each fetus was with a single head and a pair of arms and legs. The twins were joined at the lower chest and the upper abdomen. Only one functional fetal heart was observed centrally between both the fetuses with slight tendency toward one of the fetuses (figures 1 and 2). Single anterior placenta was seen with the umbilical cord and a normal amount of fluid. The color Doppler study showed two aortic arches emerging from the single functional heart (figure 2). On the basis of these findings, a diagnosis of dicephalic thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twins was made (figure 3).

Figure 1: Grayscale transabdominal ultrasound. Longitudinal (left) and transverse (right) views show the fusion site with single central heart.Figure 1: Grayscale transabdominal ultrasound. Longitudinal (left) and transverse (right) views show the fusion site with single central heart. Figure 2: Three-dimensional ultrasound image shows two fused fetuses with free lower limbs.Figure 2: Three-dimensional ultrasound image shows two fused fetuses with free lower limbs. Figure 3: Transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound shows single central heart with two aortic arches and two descending aortas.Figure 3: Transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound shows single central heart with two aortic arches and two descending aortas.

Outcome

The parents were informed of the malformation and the likely outcome if the twins survived after delivery. They decided to terminate the pregnancy and refused further evaluation and investigation. A cesarean section was performed at the request of the parents in the hospital, and the delivery of viable conjoined twins age 19 weeks was achieved without complication (figure 4 and supplementary video). The conjoined twins died a few minutes after delivery.

Figure 4: Photographic images (a-d) show the thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twins immediately after delivery.Figure 4: Photographic images (a-d) show the thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twins immediately after delivery.

Preloader Anim
Video of conjoined twins after delivery by cesarean section at 19-weeks gestation.

Discussion

Conjoined twins are popularly known as Siamese twins. The original Siamese twins were born in Siam (now Thailand) in 1811. They were males and lived for about 62 years. They moved to the U.S., where they worked in circuses, then became subjects of scientific research and finally farmers. They married two sisters in 1843 and fathered 22 children.1,2

Conjoined twinning is a random event, unrelated to hereditary factors.3 No maternal age effect has been found.4 They are considered rare forms of twin gestations. Conjoined twinning results from late twinning of a single zygote. The incidence rate is about 1 in every 200 identical twins. The estimated incidence of this phenomenon is between 1 in 50,000 to 100,000 live births.5,6 It is more frequently found among females with a ratio of 3:1.1,7 Conjoined twins share a single common chorion, placenta, and amniotic sac. However, these features are not unique for conjoined twins, as some monozygotic twins who are nonconjoined share the same structures.7,8 Similar to all monozygotic twins, all conjoined twins also have the same sex.7

The medical term used to describe conjoined twins ends with the suffix "pagus" from the Greek word "fixed." Five types of conjoined twins have been described:

  1. Thoracopagus (joined at thorax)
  2. Omphalopagus (joined at the anterior abdominal wall)
  3. Craniopagus (joined at the cranium)
  4. Syncephalus (joined twins with one head)
  5. Ischiopagus (joined at the buttocks)3

The most common form of conjoined twins is fusion of the anterior thorax and/or abdomen (referred to as thoracopagus, omphalopagus and thoraco-omphalopagus -- as in our case), which altogether constitutes 70% of conjoined twins.8 Increased nuchal fold thickness has been documented in multiple cases of conjoined twins. It is mainly associated with thoracopagus conjoined twins.9

The cause of conjoined twins is unknown. Two theories have been postulated to explain the origin of this phenomenon:

  1. Fission theory is the traditional one in which the fertilized egg is incompletely split, causing delayed separation of the embryonic mass after day 12 of fertilization.
  2. Fusion theory, in which the fertilized egg is completely separated, but the stem cells fuse with like-stem cells in the other twin, leading to fusion of both twins together.6-8,10,11

Conjoined twins are reported as early as the 10th week of gestation.10 When the diagnosis of the conjoined twins is made, the type and severity of the abnormality should be assessed with two- and three-dimensional ultrasound, CT, or MRI.4,9 They are generally incompatible with life. 65% of cases were stillborn, and of those that were born alive, 35% died within the first 24 hours. Only 25% survived to an age where surgical separation could be performed.1

The surgical management of the conjoined twins recognizes three categories:10

  • Category I: No surgical intervention should be considered when the cardiac fusion is such that it is not possible to construct one single functioning heart.10
  • Category II: Emergency separation in case of the following:
    • Death of one of the twins
    • One of the twins is dying and threatening the life of the other
    • Presence of an anomaly that is incompatible with life if left untreated.10
  • Category III: Planned separation when the infants' condition is deemed stable to perform the necessary imaging investigations that allow precise mapping of the separation.10

The ideal timing for separation would be around 3 months of age when the physiological condition and pliability of tissues are optimal. A tertiary referral center with an experienced medical team of surgeons, anesthetists, and intensivists is required in case of surgical intervention. Furthermore, success depends on previous experience.10

The first successful operation to separate conjoined twins was performed by Dr. Eugène-Louis Doyen in 1902 in Paris for the separation of the Radica-Doodica sisters, one of whom had developed abdominal tuberculosis and died but the other survived.12

The likelihood of a successful separation is dependent on good prenatal imaging with ultrasound and MRI.13 The major role of imaging is to analyze the extent to which the organs are shared so that a reasonable assessment of surgical separability can be made. Sharing of heart or brain virtually excludes separability.14

Surgical separation depends on the conjoining site and the organs that are shared. It can range from a relatively simple to a very complicated operation, and most of them are risky and life-threatening.7 Separation is unlikely to succeed if the hearts are united. However, if the hearts are separate, the success of the surgery depends on the status of the other organs.15 Cesarean section is indicated when surgical separation and viability is possible to minimize complications to the fetus and the mother.4

When severe forms are diagnosed prior to 24-weeks gestation, termination via vaginal delivery should be considered.1 In our case, the conjoined twins were joined at the chest and the abdomen forming a thoraco-omphalopagus, with single functional heart and two aortas. They were classified as category I, where no operative management is possible. The diagnosis was made in the second trimester (16-weeks gestation), and the family chose termination. The pregnancy was terminated by cesarean section; however, there was no indication for cesarean section, and a normal vaginal delivery should have been attempted. Cesarean section may have been attempted owing to a lack of clear local guidelines and experience in dealing with a condition of this rarity.

Learning points

  1. Early correct prenatal diagnosis is essential for better obstetric management and treatment planning.
  2. Ultrasound is the modality of choice for prenatal detection of conjoined twins, while MRI is the modality of choice for better characterization.
  3. Termination of pregnancy, especially at a late stage, is fraught with problems.
  4. When severe forms of conjoined twinning are diagnosed prior to 24 weeks, termination via vaginal delivery should be considered.
  5. Cesarean section is indicated when surgical separation and viability are possible to minimize complications to the fetus and the mother.
  6. The risk from termination to the mother is higher the more advanced the pregnancy is.
  7. There are also social and legal issues with late termination, influenced by cultural and religious beliefs. This stresses the need for early and accurate diagnosis to enable a correct management plan, thus mitigating those potential complications.

Dr. Omar Muayad Sultan is from the Tikrit University College of Medicine in Tikrit, Iraq, and the Nasser Institute Hospital in Cairo, Egypt. Dr. Ahmed Said Tawfeek is from Al Noor Hospital in Madinat Zayed City, United Arab Emirates, and also the Tikrit University College of Medicine.

The case report was originally published by BJR | case reports on October 22, 2015.

References

  1. Sabih D, Ahmad E, Sabih A, Sabih Q. Ultrasound diagnosis of cephalopagus conjoined twin pregnancy at 29 weeks. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2010;6(4): e38.
  2. Chang and Eng. Encyclopaedia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/105508/Chang-and-Eng. Accessed May 18, 2015.
  3. Hagen-Ansert SL. Textbook of Diagnostic Ultrasonography. 6th ed. Vol. 2. Canada: Andrew Allen; 2006:1103-1104.
  4. Sharma P, Ghimire A. Conjoined twins with omphalocele and unilateral club foot: A case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2010;4:2533-2535.
  5. Putman CE, Ravin CE. Textbook of Diagnostic Imaging. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Dallas, TX: W. B. Saunders; 1994:1922-1923.
  6. Rees AE, Vujanic GM, Williams WM. Epidemic of conjoined twins in cardiff. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100(4):388-391.
  7. OsmanaĞaoĞlu MA, Aran T, Güven S, Kart C, Ozdemir O, Bozkaya H. Thoracopagus conjoined twins: A case report. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011.
  8. Sharma UK, Dangol A, Chawla CD, Shretha CD. Antenatal detection of conjoined twin. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2007;46(167):133-135.
  9. Ratner AN, Terrone D, Cosgrove FJ. Thoracopagus conjoined twins. J Diagn Med Sonog. 2006; 22(1):53-55.
  10. Chiabi A, Nkemayim D, Tchokoteu PF, et al. Conjoined twins in Cameroon: Issues inherent in diagnosis and management in the African context. Afr J Reprod Health. 2009;13(3):127-135.
  11. Makhoul IR, Goldsher D, Okopnik M, Bronshtein M. Early prenatal diagnosis of conjoined cephalopagus twins. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003;5:530-531.
  12. Aird I. Conjoined twins -- further observations. Br Med J. 1959;1(5133):1313-1315.
  13. McHugh K, Kiely EM, Spitz L. Imaging of conjoined twins. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(9):899-910.
  14. Shah DS, Tomar G, Preetkiran, Prajapati H. Conjoined twins - Report of two cases. Ind J Radiol Imag. 2006;16(2):199-201.
  15. McMahon CJ, Spencer R. Congenital heart defects in conjoined twins: Outcome after surgical separation of thoracopagus. Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;27(1):1-12.
Page 1 of 509
Next Page