AuntMinnie.com RSNA 2005
 about/contact | site map | advertising

  • Home
    • Radiology News
    • News in Brief
    • People in the News
    • New Installations
    • Conference Coverage
    • - RSNA 2012 News
    • - ECR 2013
    • - RADCast, RSNA, more...
    • Special Report
    • - Molecular Breast Imaging
    • - Breast MRI
    • - Trends in Radiology
    • AuntMinnie Mobile
    • Social Media
    • - AuntMinnie on Facebook
    • - AuntMinnie on Twitter
    • AuntMinnieEurope
  • Vendor Connect
    • Vendor Connect Home
    • View all vendors
  • Career Center
    • Jobs Home
    • Salary Survey Results
    • Looking for a job?
    • - Search for a Job
    • - Jobs by state
    • - Upload your resume
    • Looking for Candidates?
    • - Search Resumes
    • - Post a Job Ad
  • Reference
    • Reference Home
    • Active Reference Library
    • - Nuclear Medicine
    • - Thoracic Imaging
    • Looking for Candidates?
    • - Search Resumes
    • - Post a Job Ad
    • eLibrary
    • White Papers
    • Market Reports
    • Regulatory Updates
    • Organized Radiology
  • MarketPlace
    • Marketplace Home
    • Bookstore
    • - Browse all Books
    • - Browse Radiology Books
    • - Browse Market Reports
    • Equipment Classifieds
    • Career Center
  • Education
    • Education Home
    • Case of the Day
    • - Recent Cases
    • - Case Archives
    • - Archives by Month
    • CME
    • - AuntMinnieCME.com
    • - other CME resources
    • Resource Center
    • - Enterography
  • Conferences
    • Conferences, search all
    • Add your Conference
  • Links
    • Links
    • - Browse links
    • - Search links
    • - Linking to your site
    • Headline Service
    • RSS/XML news feed
  • Communities
    • Advanced Visualization
    • CT
    • Digital X-Ray
    • Healthcare IT
    • Imaging Leaders
    • Molecular Imaging
    • MRI
    • PACS
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Residents
    • Ultrasound
    • Women's Imaging
  • Forums
    • Forum Home
    • Forum Topics
    • - General Radiology
    • - Residents
    • - Medical Students
    • - Technologists
    • - PACS
    • - Interventional
    • - Academic
    • - Off-Topic
    • - Fellowships
    • - Case of the Day
    • Forum FAQ
    • Terms of Service
    • Forum Options
    • Advanced Search
  • Webinars
    • PACS College Webinars
    • Webinars / Symposia
 Sign in | Register for Free! | Newsletters Show Offer
 
« All RSNA 2005 News


Most Printed Articles Top E-mailed Articles
Ultralow-dose lung MDCT may still find ground-glass lesions
By Eric Barnes
AuntMinnie.com staff writer
November 30, 2005

CHICAGO - Thoracic radiologists pay special attention to the so-called ground-glass opacities (GGOs) they find in some patients' CT lung images, and for good reason. The generally nonspecific findings, seen as mottled areas of elevated attenuation, may be associated with various interstitial and bronchoalveolar pathologies, and thus a potentially higher risk of malignancy.

In practice, the fear of missing GGOs is one of the reasons why some radiologists are reluctant to embrace ultralow-dose CT lung screening.

At yesterday's RSNA lung screening sessions, researchers from Japan addressed the issue by presenting findings from their study using a commercially available GGO phantom, which they subjected to various CT doses to determine the minimum exposure levels needed to detect GGOs in CT datasets. The results for low-dose screening advocates are encouraging.

Yoshinori Funama, Ph.D., from the University of Kumamoto in Japan presented his group's research, aimed at determining the low-dose limits for GGO detection at CT.

"Ground glass accounted for 91% of missed lesions at low-dose screening CT" in one study, Funama said.

The group repeatedly scanned a commercially available chest phantom with acrylic simulated ground-glass opacities on a 40-detector-row scanner (Brilliance 40, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA).

Collimation was set at 1.25 mm, rotation time was 0.5 sec, and the reconstructed slice thickness was 5 mm at 120 kVp. The kVp remained constant while the mAs settings were varied during each scanning sequence at 15, 22.5, 90, and 180 mAs. Attenuation values of the simulated lung parenchyma and GGOs were -900 and -800 HU, respectively.

"Simulated GGOs sized 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 mm were located at levels of the lung apex, the bifurcation of the trachea, and the lung base," Funama said. "We extracted 10 x 30-mm rectangular areas with or without GGOs from the chest phantom images scanned with each mAs (setting). Then we prepared a total of 450 images (five different mAs settings x 30 images with and without GGOs x three scan levels) for the observer performance test."

Diagnostic performance was estimated using Az values, expressed as the area under the ROC curve, and CTDIw dose index was calculated using a cylindrical phantom, he said.

The results showed Az values of 0.873 at 15 mAs, 0.892 at 22.5 mAs, 0.905 at 45 mAs, 0.894 at 90 mAs, and 0.908 at 180 mAs. The overall difference in the Az values of the five datasets was not statistically significant (p = 0.43), according to a two-way ANOVA test. The measured CTDIw was 1.2 mGy at 15 mAs, 1.8 mGy at 22.5 mAs, 3.7 mGy at 45 mAs, 7.4 mGy at 90 mAs, and 14.7 mGy at 180 mAs.

"Detectability of GGOs at 45 mAs or 90 mAs compared (favorably) to that achieved with 180 mAs," Funama said, while "the CTDIw at 45 mAs was reduced by 75% relative to that at 180 mAs. Detectability of GGOs was preserved at scan with 15 mAs as well as at scan with 180 mAs."

Nevertheless, noise was higher in the upper portion of the lung phantom compared to the middle and lower regions, he said, which presents an important issue for future research. Noise reduction filters may be helpful, Funama said.

A separate report presented yesterday by the Radiology-Pathology Consensus Group (RSNA abstract SSG04-01) examined 125 cases of previously diagnosed broncholoalveolar cell carcinoma (BAC) to correlate CT attenuation with histopathology. Among 12 pure ground-glass nodules in the cohort, showing varying degrees of infiltration, only one was unanimously agreed upon as pure BAC by the pathology panel, the group wrote. The researchers concluded that pure BAC was rare, and found a strong correlation between nodule attenuation and the degree of invasion.

By Eric Barnes
AuntMinnie.com staff writer
November 30, 2005

Related Reading

Management strategies evolve as CT finds more lung nodules, August 19, 2005

Lung PET rules when CT is equivocal, discordant, July 12, 2005

CT and PET screening useful in detecting early lung cancer, June 15, 2005

Emphysema alters CT appearance of benign nodules, May 4, 2005

More PET/CT lung masses seen with hardware-based fusion, April 26, 2005

Copyright © 2005 AuntMinnie.com



Most Printed Articles Top E-mailed Articles






|| About || Advertising || Bookstore || Breast MRI || Career Center || Case of the Day || Communities || Conferences || Contact Us || ECR News 2013 || Education || Equipment Classifieds || Facebook || Forums || Home || Links || Marketplace || Mobile || Molecular Breast Imaging || New Installations || News in Brief || People in the News || Privacy Policy || RSNA News 2012 || Reference || Salary Survey Results || Trends in Radiology || Twitter || Vendor Connect || Webinars || XML/RSS ||
1.5117 s www.auntminnie.com tuc06web
Copyright © 2013 AuntMinnie.com. All Rights Reserved.